[gs] quon wrote:
That why I said I am assuming GS is getting them. They haven't said a word which indicates they aren't allowed to. The GSPs that aren't getting it have started telling their customers so those customers know other arrangements will have to be made if they want BF4 hosting.
We do not say anything unless it has been explicitly approved by the studio. GSPs that have already said something has a different interpretation of what an nda is.
Thank you. You just proved my point. The GSPs that have said anything are the ones that are not hosting which means no NDA to abide by. Hopefully the studio lets you say something soon. I have money to send lol.
I think quon's point was that a NDA is a non-disclosure
agreement. The fact that they disclosed
something would mean they did not abide by that NDA. I don't think you really have an idea of what an NDA
is. NDAs are not "nullified" if the subject matter doesn't turn out to be completely in your favor. GameServers, like many other providers, may or not be hosts - you won't know until its announced.
In otherwords, I would expect that any provider that broke that would likely be considered much less in the future.
At least those are my interpretations and thoughts on quon's post.